This is a pretty strong post, not for people with weak stomachs. If you aren’t up for it, please don’t read it. I shall resume normal posts shortly.
The Necessary (Albeit Bugging) Preliminaries
I have never liked to hold on to identities. Why? Because, an identity is always touted as something that defines you. But the funny thing is your identity is not defined by the people who are like you, but by people who are unlike you. For instance, if everyone around you ate pure vegetarian food, then it would be simply meaningless to go on about calling yourself a vegetarian. So, while admittedly convoluted logic, I am sure you can see that what defines you or sets you apart is not so much your identities, but (“everything you are” – “your identities”).
But on the other hand, I can of course absolutely see the need for identities. In today’s world, where all the peoples are considered to have the same set of personal rights and theoretically suffer no need to make way for people with alternate beliefs (be they richer or stronger), it has become absolutely essential to maintain and stick on to your identities, religious, linguistic or whatever else matters to you the most.
This being the case, the identity that I most closely hold on to is “Tamil”. Because that one word suitably describes the food I eat, the clothes I wear, the language I speak, my cultural upbringing, my social values, my very approximate appearance, my religious habits, my tolerance to heat and so on.
Also, I am not exactly proud to call myself Tamil. It is but an identity that helps others get a picture of the kind of things that I hold as an unchangeable part of me. If nobody challenges any aspect of this identity, “Tamil” then merely serves as a showcase identity. I also do not go overboard with my sense of ownership over a Tamil identity. I always keep reminding myself of this story I read about a particular Nazi Aryan Supremacist who discovered that he had been adopted of Jewish parents and unable to cope with the shock, responded by cross-dressing (you read right, cross-dressing.).
Another identity of course is Indian. This is not something I am comfortable calling myself. Because, apart from nationality, Gods, cricket and curry, there is little else the term Indian offers as clue to outsiders regarding my practices. The primary use is because, considering the few outsiders who can actually identify India on a map, it serves as a general simplification to aid the uninformed. And needless to say, I am not proud to call myself an Indian.
Before I proceed, I want to make clear that I am not a very patriotic fellow. While I too have been taught to celebrate India and its unity in diversity and everything, and while I actually admire all of it, I can’t help but ask questions. For all its positives, India presents a bundle of contradictions in my eyes.
And for all the India worshipping buggers, I am not anti-Indian. I only consider myself loosely affiliated, considering India is really complex and difficult to understand. And even if I were someday, God forbid, to sever all ties with India internally, I will by no means turn a Tamil Nationalist. So please do not bombard me with comments of disappreciation, if you were indeed planning to do so.
For me personally, these two identities of “Tamil” and “Indian” have never presented a problem and have always existed in a happy union. Until recently, when the Civil War in Sri Lanka burst once again, onto the international scene.
My Qualifications
I grew up in a very protective family, where they went all out to try and make me a global (and slightly westernized) citizen and strictly shielded me from all the crap (politics and movies and personalities and so on) that plagued Indian society. Also, an ultra-sanitized and highly pro-Indian education meant that my education with regards to problems in society and nation was insufficient. I thought caste only meant the 4 varnas and was oblivious (until recently) to the real and persistent problems presented by the caste system. I was led to believe that Kashmir was an integral part of India and that Pakistan was a tribal, terrorist nation trying to steal it from under our noses. And with specific reference to this post, I wasn’t even given to understand that Tamils lived in Sri Lanka. In fact, there was this Sri Lankan origin (refugee) friend of mine who too believed that Sri Lanka was Sinhalese and Budhist and couldn’t even explain how he was a Hindu and they spoke Tamil at his home!
However, with the internet and laptop and the idle hours to while away blogging, it was not long before I rectified this chink in my armor and educated myself not only about SL tamils, but about literally everything else of note in this world (thanks to Mr Jimmy Wales). The past 3 years of my college life have left my brain cells feeling they could teach Bangalore a thing or two about handling explosive growth. And this has allowed me to form balanced (imho) opinions on a wide variety of subjects.
(The above 2 paras were only written to suggest that despite being born an always-politically-correct and avoid-trouble-at-all-costs, true-bleu Chennaite, I believe I am qualified enough to actually give an opinion on the subject, for I have spent many days reading about the conflict right from its genesis.)
Anticipating Trouble
Regarding the recent conflict, I had a slight inkling (note: very slight inkling) that the LTTE may be nearing its end around 3 years ago. It was around that time when the Sri Lankan Government absolutely crippled the LTTE by having it branded as a terrorist organization by all the western powers. It followed this up with a visit to China in a huge entourage, with even an elephant thrown in amongst the courtesy presents. It was an absolute win-win trip. Sri Lanka got the huge amount of weaponry needed to wipe out the Tigers whilst China was allowed to secure its ties with Sri Lanka, which figures as an important player in the former’s String of Pearls strategy to secure a safe oil transport route right from the Straits of Hormuz to the Eastern Chinese waters. And most importantly, it made full use of the split in ranks of the LTTE offering Col. Karuna security and comfort and left the LTTE pretty much crippled.
Then came news reports of successive SL Govt victories in battle with the rebels. The news reports on Google became really frequent and all my Sinhalese friends sounded upbeat everytime I asked them how the war was progressing.
Indian Media and Sri Lanka
(a gross misuse of terminology, but its difficult to describe ‘media’ and ‘fool’ in one succinct term)
Somewhere in the middle of Sri Lanka’s victorious march, news reports of the Sri Lankan war erupted in the Tamil media and took us all by surprise. It was no doubt signalled off by requests coming in from LTTE and reaching their sympathizers on the mainland, who are not insiginificant in number. And once this happened, it took little time for the national media to catch up on the news. And once this happened, I have been feeling nothing but disgust. Disgust for the national media and the tamil and national politicos of our land in that order.
Firstly, let us look at what is wrong with the national media. It is as meaningless as trying to point out what is wrong about wrongness, or what is soft about softness, but I’ll give it a shot. Now, there is a new coterie of news channels that have established themselves on the national circus (I do not deny they are an improvement on DD). These organizations consist of people who are of the kind I went to school with: stupid, crass, needlessly cynical, bubbling over with patriotism whenever they come across terms like “India” or “Pakistan”, but nevertheless, wannabe Americans. Some of my complaints against them which I shall care to list (and only regarding the topic at hand) are:-
1. They keep saying Prabhakaran is a terrorist and the LTTE is a terrorist organization as if to emphasize to all who care to read their views that there is absolutely no difference between Prabhakaran and Osama Bin Laden.
2. They keep saying Prabhakaran is a terrorist because: “The LTTE have committed many dastardly acts of terror, including the killing of Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi and the Sri Lankan President Premadasa”. Ask the fucker who wrote this line to name one more incident and I’m sure he’ll probably fumble about for a computer with an internet connection so that he can google something relevant. If he cannot manage it, resourceful as he is, he’ll probably say – “I don’t think I need to. Killing our beloved Prime Minister is enough to declare Prabhakaran a terrorist. End of questions.”
3. They seem to have taken up the cause of Nation building and self-censor their reports (ie. modify the reports of other worthy international organizations suitably) so that the Tamilians reading their reports understand the terrorist nature of LTTE and see that it is in the interest of all, especially tamils, to get rid of this scourge. And they make the general Indian public understand that if there is a separate Eelam formed, Tamil nationalist sentiments will also rise and pose problems to the unity of India. So the Indian public must oppose LTTE and Eelam at all costs. Wow! Although I am prone to think that the stupidity of the media and the weak Indian response has created a lot more dissent in TN than the formation of an Eelam would ever have.
4. In the pathetic excuses for debates that they organize, they bring in two standard debaters always: Cho and Subramanian Swamy. These two, they self-declare as the moderate tamil voice. On the other side, they get in people, who in my opinion are the actual moderate tamil voices, and then try to teach these people why their views are wrong and shameful. I can only writhe in horror as I watch this orgasm of stupidity.
5. What do you get when you make stupid people listen to the views of cynics? You get the folks who work at IBN Live and Times Now (prime accused) and NDTV (to a much lesser extent).
Whatever I may have against Vaiko, I won’t at any point deny that he has genuine concern for SL Tamils. He may be fanatical and going overboard, but he does not do it simply for the sake of gaining votes (unlike Karunanidhi and Jayalalitha). However, if one were to believe these national news reports (!), one might get the impression that Vaiko is simply a random dipshit fanatic who keeps raising the Sri Lankan issue in order to inspire “regionalist sentiments” and milk it for votes. Talk about cynicism.
And NDTV sent a reporter to Sri Lanka (I think Nitin Gokhale). He was interviewing the SL Def Scy, Gotabhaya Rajapakse. He asked GR whether China was leveraging on India’s inability to supply Sri Lanka weapons because of concerns from its own Tamil population, and equipping the SL army with sophisticated machinery and training in return for strategic benefits (such as the Hambantota project). A marvelous conspiracy theory indeed.
If I could have spoken to him, as God had spoken to Moses, I would have probably told him: Fool. We are talking about living people here. Not plastic pieces that you used as a boy while playing games like Risk. In the very least, respect their sentiments and try to put in your head that stuff like morality is a bit more important than diplomacy here. Or at least restrict such stuff to print. What the fuck did you imagine GR would say? – “Yeah yeah! China worked out a brilliant strategy to outflank India in its own neighbourhood and we are proud to be a part of it!”??!?
I am not a staunch pro-LTTE fellow or something, and its not like I cannot stand any criticism of the organization. But I do expect stuff like objectivity, intelligence, educated opinion etc… in the news reports. All 3 of which the Indian media lack. But the real funny thing is, much like voting for a party, I’ll still have to keep visiting these news channels’ website to get my daily dose. However, if the news is even mildly important, I prefer reports from BBC, Al-Jazeera or the Associated Press. These international organizations are miles above the Indian media in terms of professionalism and I really commend their effort to provide objective views in face of the immense pressure that has been exerted against them while reporting the Sri Lankan Civil War.
To give you an idea of the stupidity of the news organizations, take a look at this video. It shows how the Tiger supremo, who ought to have lead a life in ditches and struggling for basic amenities actually can afford luxuries for his kids like cakes, chocolates and toys. And here I was thinking they were rich enough to buy Aircraft and Armored Personnel Carriers. Must have been a figment of my imagination I suppose. And yes, Charles Anthony even got an education from abroad and pursuing a comfortable MBA life abroad. I suppose the Charles Anthony who got killed in the conflict must have been a dupe. Just like the body of Prabhakaran. Just to convince people that their leaders were still with them. How diabolical! And so we have Mr Arnab Goswami (aka amoeba-brain man amongst me and my friends), sitting in a random Mumbai/Delhi studio living of American money questioning the commitment of Prabhakaran to his so called “Eelam”. Funny!
Tamil Nadu and India’s Response
I have also observed this slight apathy from well-off Tamils towards the Sri Lankan conflict as if it is happening somewhere in Africa (which would be more understandable). Even the reservation issue seemed to attract a greater volume of opinion. Although it is difficult to say if this is right or wrong, I’d like to say I am a bit disappointed. You can ask why you ought to care, but if you were in the place of SL Tamils, you would at least expect some concern from others who claim to share your identity. Unfortunately, when money comes into the picture, little else really seems to matter.
The only people who have actually managed to express an opinion and have it heard on the national scene are the pro-LTTE fanatics and the vehemently anti-LTTE idiots. The problem is the first lot is that since they are so unquestioningly and blindly pro-LTTE, no one will respect their opinion. The 2nd class, no one cares about, because they are idiots. The sad thing is there is no forum for the moderate/average Tamilian to express his views. Or indeed, no forum to guage what the moderate Tamil view is. With a highly manipulative state government that seems to have become increasingly concerned about not expressing an opinion that will disrupt its alliance with the Congress, it is really difficult to convey a concerted opinion to the nation and the world.
Personal Views
When it comes to my views on the LTTE, I suppose I always supported it, if only in the way the PMK supported the DMK government while it was in the alliance. I had a great deal of reservations, but I supported it. And I did not really care about people who opposed the LTTE, so long as their opinion was carefully considered. Which in a majority of the times, is not the case.
I get pissed when people say the LTTE is terrorist because it killed Rajiv Gandhi and hence, it does not deserve support. I get pissed when I hear people say that if Eelam is formed, TN will also wanna become independent and hence, LTTE does not deserve support. And I get pissed most of all, when people tell me they are Gandhians and believe in non-violence and cannot support any violent movement.
While I think the RG killing was a mistake, I view it as a vendetta killing. Which may not be a good thing. But I don’t think it is near enough to call an insurgency which is much bigger than any single man (Rajiv Gandhi included) a terrorist movement.
I generally laugh away the 2nd argument. Because if everyone acted for their self-interest alone without getting morality in the picture, there can really be nothing in the nature of a society. We’d all have remained cave-men. This argument is stupid and I hope you, the readers, think so too.
The 3rd argument generally gets my goat. I don’t like to quote famous personalities because I don’t like to appeal to authority and thus consider myself incapable of independent thought, but Mandela pretty much sums up what I want to say:- “I followed the Gandhian strategy for as long as I could, but then there came a point in our struggle when the brute force of the oppressor could no longer be countered through passive resistance alone.” So there you have it. Mandela, someone whose position as a messenger of peace, no Indian really questions (there isn’t an African community in India that could be inspired by him and turn nationalistic is there? Moreover, he did use the magic word “Gandhi” no.) justifying the use of violence. Saying essentially that the nature of the struggle depends more on the oppressor than the oppressed.
If people say LTTE kills anyone who expresses alternate opinion, then its a more valid point. But I’d like to brush it off as politics. If you are surprised by the previous statement, don’t be. You’ve been doing it all along. Haven’t you forgiven the Chinese Government for Tiananmen or Tibet or the Revolution itself? Haven’t you not bothered about India dealing with the Soviet Union, where talk of human rights itself would have been dangerous? It’s the same thing for LTTE, in my eyes.
Finally, coming to why I supported (for lack of a better word) the LTTE, I’d like to say that if I were in a situation wherein my home country denied me equal rights and treated me like a second class citizen (which thankfully is not the case) AND if people who share my identity were actually a majority population in the areas where they lived, I too would have considered such policies an affront to my dignity. And if peaceful efforts failed, I would have considered taking up arms as well. But this is generally acknowledged by everyone and the LTTE did enjoy a great deal of support even internationally in its initial years.
After the IPKF came and went, LTTE controlled vast swathes of territory towards the mid 90s. Even upto this point, I think I would have supported the LTTE (had I been capable of making a decision on such matters then). But after that, the LTTE became just a bit too demanding. Probably buoyed by its success, it kept arming itself as if to suggest that it did not even believe it could establish its goals without the use of further violence. It failed to realize that no matter how much arms it procured, it would always be in a back-foot as it was an underground organization while the Government was acknowledged by everyone. And this is probably when a lot of internal dissent started appearing within the organization and what was once a movement with understandable aims started becoming one of those greyish movements that it continued to remain till its death this year. And the SL government, at least with respect to the Tamil issue had pretty much been in the grey always. So towards the end, it became increasingly difficult to choose between the two.
I mentally sided with the LTTE only because of the following reasons:
1. I spoke to a Jaffna friend and he said the general SL Tamil populace (excluding hill country tamils and tamils in the south and the muslims), supported the LTTE. It was, after all, an organization fighting for them, and if they believed it represented them, I felt that counted a lot.
2. I have seen interviews of Tiger fighters and sympathizers. I really believe that these fighters believe in their cause and fight of their own independent calling. Without being forcibly conscripted or anything. Also, they really did not seem to hate the Sinhalese people just for being Sinhalese. This was another important thing for me.
3. The LTTE, as far as I know, has never conducted an attack that targets civilians alone. Considering the resources it commanded, it could have easily turned into a terrorist outfit. But I believe that they have a strong political ideology and this stopped them from descending into a terrorist organization.
4. Even my Sinhalese friends acknowledge that the Government is probably not going to provide the Tamil areas autonomy. So I suppose if the LTTE disappears, they will continue to be ruled by Colombo, which may (negligible chance) or may not (in all probability) treat the Tamils well. Anyways, I myself would much rather rule myself poorly than have someone else rule me, even if they do it better.
Conclusion
Now the LTTE has been defeated beyond redemption. So let me just ask what cards do the Tamils have on hand to counter the Government? – NONE. What is to stop the Government in continuing its pro-Sinhala policies? – Nothing. The UN is pretty much a lame duck when it comes to Sri Lanka as it has the veto of both China and Russia. So there is absolutely no possibility of UN instigated war crimes tribunal on Sri Lanka. There can be no UN monitored implementation of devolution to Northern and Eastern areas. There can be no sanctions on Sri Lanka from USA or the West. Ok, there can be. But it will be easily forgotten by the sands of time. Hasn’t the US given India a nuclear deal? Or hasn’t India purchased large-scale weaponry from Israel? In fact, a recent interview by Fonseka pretty much serves as validation – “I strongly believe that this country belongs to the Sinhalese but there are minority communities and we treat them like our people…We being the majority of the country, 75%, we will never give in and we have the right to protect this country…We are also a strong nation … They can live in this country with us. But they must not try to, under the pretext of being a minority, demand undue things.” (1)
However, I do see some hope. Rajapakse, despite being surrounded by zealots, did come across to me as a bit sincere in implementing his promises. Lasantha Wickrematunge, in his post-humously published editorial of his own death, said that Rajapakse was a man of sound principles himself. I myself can see that Rajapakse does not hate the Tamils as an ethnic group itself. I am quite sure he isn’t a “mass-murderer” indulging in a “genocide” of the Tamils. (The way words are being bandied about in this war!) For the sake of all those poor people, whose torturous period of independence was only exceeded by the suffering they had to endure in the latter stages of the war, I hope the current Government will prove sincere in its promises. If the Tamils live in peace and equality in a unified Lanka, then so be it. If they cannot, well what the fuck can I say?
For all those who have reached this far without knowing anything significant about the history of the conflict, I’d recommend that you read Neville Jayaweera’s work (I don’t want to link this):-
http://gandhiunity-progressparty.blogspot.com/2008/10/into-turbulance-of-jaffna.html
1. http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/peter_foster/blog/2008/12/03/behind_the_muzzled_voices_from_a_troubed_sri_lanka